Algorithmic Hiring Risk & Workforce Equity Consulting
Automated applicant tracking and AI screening tools sit at the center of employment discrimination exposure today — under Title VII, the ADA, and a growing patchwork of state AI-hiring laws. Fair Hire audits the systems, trains the people who run them, and builds the documentation trail that protects your organization before a claim is filed.
Independent technical review of your screening system's decision logic, scoring, and disparate-impact exposure.
Practical guidance for recruiters and managers overseeing AI-flagged candidates.
Discovery-grade documentation review, before opposing counsel asks for it.
Why this matters now
When a candidate was rejected, was that decision made by a person, or by the algorithm — and is that distinction documented anywhere? That single gap is where discrimination claims are won and lost. Regulators and plaintiffs' attorneys are increasingly focused on exactly this question, and most ATS platforms were never built to answer it clearly. Fair Hire closes that gap before it becomes a lawsuit.
How we're different
Generic compliance training treats AI hiring bias as an HR policy problem. It isn't — it's a technical and evidentiary problem. Our audit methodology is built from close, technical analysis of how these systems actually behave: rejection logic, scoring criteria, cross-platform data flows, and vendor integration architecture. We deliver findings the way a forensic reviewer would — dated, specific, and defensible.
See all servicesWho we serve
Using ATS or AI-driven screening tools who want to know their real exposure before it's tested in litigation.
Needing a technical co-consultant for clients facing algorithmic discrimination claims.
Wanting to reduce liability designed into their own products.